Elon Musk’s $55B Tesla Pay Plan Voided by Delaware Court

Elon Musk's $55B Tesla Pay Plan Voided by Delaware Court

In an unusual decision, a Delaware judge has voided Elon Musk‘s $55 billion pay package from the electric automaker Tesla, siding with a shareholder who sued, claiming the sum was excessive.

The decision throws Musk’s enormous fortune into a cloud of doubt, with the 2018 pay plan making up a significant portion of his wealth. Were it completely voided, Musk would no longer be the world’s richest man and would fall below Amazon founder Jeff Bezos and luxury goods mogul Bernard Arnualt.

Musk has subsequently sold tens of billions of dollars in Tesla stock and also secured some of that stock against personal loans, both of which he has used to help fund his other businesses. That includes his $44 billion takeover of Twitter, now called X. That being said, the plaintiffs argue that the tranche of shares in question remains untouched.

See Also:  Elon Musk's Response to Satya Nadella's X Post and Its Implications, 'I don't mean to be a pest'

Twitter post

In a post on X after the ruling was issued, Musk wrote, Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware. ”In the ruling, Chancery Court Chief Judge Kathleen St. J. McCormick wrote: “In the final analysis, Musk launched a self-driving process, recalibrating the speed and direction along the way as he saw fit. The process arrived at an unfair price. And through this litigation, the plaintiff requests a recall.”

According to The Statesman, “Plaintiff has demonstrated that rescission is reasonable, appropriate, and practicable,” McCormick wrote. “This grant is not ‘too complex to unscramble. Rescission is uniquely available: no third-party interests are implicated, the entire grant sits unexercised and undisturbed, and exercised shares would be subject to the five-year hold period.

See Also:  Linda Yaccarino Responds to Musk's Explicit Remark in Advertiser Controversy

“Defendants argue that rescission is a harsh consequence that would leave Musk uncompensated,” she continued. “But Musk’s preexisting equity stake provided him tens of billions of dollars for his efforts. The Defendants have not offered a viable alternative short of leaving the Grant intact.

”The judge also says that negotiations between Musk and the board were not adversarial in nature, with the board essentially giving Musk what he asked for, even though he was unlikely to leave the company had he not received the pay package.

The ruling comes at the same time that Musk has publicly stated that he would like the board to authorize another pay package, one that would give him a larger ownership stake in the company.

Avatar photo
About Shrabani Sarkar 745 Articles
Shrabani Sarkar is a celebrity news author who has been covering the latest gossip and scandals in the entertainment industry for Panasiabiz. Shrabani is passionate about celebrity news and enjoys sharing her insights and opinions with her loyal fans. Shrabani can be reached at [email protected]